By Ron Kratzke, Principal Systems Engineer
Over the past year there has been an increased interest in performing “Mission Engineering” during initial concept development. This has come about for many reasons, one of which is an effort to ensure that subsequent operational and system architectures – and the systems developed to support them – are aligned with and support the missions for which they were designed in the first place. More...
By David Long, Vitech President
A good systems engineer working on a project should seek to suboptimize systems engineering. A heretical statement? Not really. In fact, the path to optimizing systems engineering lies in suboptimizing systems engineering. It may sound paradoxical, but it’s true.
The purpose of systems engineering is to deliver the desired business value to the customer efficiently and effectively, free from unintended consequences. Systems engineering does not do this in isolation. It does this in concert with project management and countless domain specialties key to the problem at hand and the solutions under consideration. For systems engineers, it’s easy to become obsessed with our processes, methods, tools, and artifacts. However, the purpose of systems engineering is not the execution of an interdisciplinary process. Nor is it generation of a specification. The purpose of systems engineering is not even delivery of the system of interest. The system we engineer is simply a means to the end – delivering the desired business value. More...
“Whenever it came time for milestone reviews, we were able to satisfy all of the customer’s requirements.” – Stephanie Chiesi, senior systems engineer (Photo copyright 2012 Arizona Daily Star)
Miriam Rich, Vitech Marketing & Communications Manager
“We [humans] put out CO2 and moisture,” explained Grant Anderson, CEO of Paragon Space Development Corporation. “If you don’t take these out of the air in a spacecraft, water can condense, causing bacteria growth, shorting out equipment, or clogging critical airflow passages, and the CO2 can cause carbon dioxide poisoning.”
Needless to say, such events are unacceptable and are why consideration of a humidity control system in a spacecraft is highly critical.
Stephanie Chiesi, senior systems engineer, worked on the humidity control subassembly for Boeing’s Crew Space Transportation (CST)-100 spacecraft while she was at Paragon Space Development Corporation. The team that Chiesi was part of designed the humidity control subassembly system for NASA’s commercial crew program.
“Humidity control in a spacecraft is unlike the system for your house, because you have to take into consideration the closed loop environment of the vehicle, as well as the conditions the system needs to survive during launch and reentry,” Chiesi explained, “factors which aren’t part of the day to day concern for humidity control in a house on Earth.”
“That’s why Vitech’s CORE [systems engineering software tool] was so helpful as we designed the CST-100,” Chiesi said. More...